247: Sleepless in Susa w/ Josh Bossé

BEMA Episode Link: 247: Sleepless in Susa w/ Josh Bossé
Episode Length: 58:12
Published Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 01:00:00 -0800
Session 6
About this episode:

Brent Billings is joined by Josh Bossé to examine Esther’s plan for getting into the king’s throne room and what she is actually trying to accomplish once she’s there.

Discussion Video for BEMA 247

BEMA 70: Esther — Purim

Join the BEMA Slack

Transcript for BEMA 247

Notes

*Note: The following notes are handwritten by me, Adam, and I reserve the right to be wrong.

BEMA 247: Sleepless in Susa w/ Josh Bossé - Study Notes

Title & Source Summary

Episode: 247 - Sleepless in Susa w/ Josh Bossé Hosts: Brent Billings and Josh Bossé Focus: Book of Esther, specifically Esther’s strategy for exposing Haman and saving her people

This episode explores the deeper narrative layers of the Book of Esther, challenging common interpretations about divine intervention and revealing Esther’s brilliant political strategy. Josh Bossé presents a reading that emphasizes human agency, community strength, and strategic wisdom over supernatural intervention. The discussion provides psychological profiles of the main characters - King Ahasuerus, Mordecai, and Haman - and demonstrates how Esther manipulated the king’s insecurity and Haman’s overconfidence through strategic silence to save her people from genocide.

Key Takeaways

God’s silence in the Book of Esther is not a narrative problem but a central theme that speaks to the experience of exile and modern faith
Attributing events like the king’s sleeplessness to direct divine intervention undermines the book’s message about human agency and community action
Esther’s plan was not simply entering the throne room bravely, but executing a sophisticated psychological manipulation through “brazen silence”
The conflict between Mordecai and Haman reflects the ancient, unfinished conflict between Saul and King Agag of the Amalekites
Haman’s ultimate weakness was his isolation, while Esther and Mordecai’s strength came from their connection to community
The Book of Esther demonstrates that the “dice” of fate are loaded - evil isolated by ambition and self-interest will eventually fail against communities built on genuine connection
In contexts where God seems silent, community becomes the primary vehicle through which divine purposes are accomplished

Main Concepts & Theories

Character Analysis: King Ahasuerus

King Ahasuerus is characterized as insecure and intellectually limited rather than cunning or image-conscious. Evidence for this interpretation includes:

His opening feast demonstrates a need to impress others by displaying his wealth and possessions, including his wife Vashti
He consistently does whatever anyone suggests to him, showing he is easily influenced and pliable
His decree against Vashti comes not from his own initiative but from his advisors pumping him up
He fails to understand basic public relations, celebrating with Haman over the decree to kill the Jews while the city is in uproar
His pliability makes him valuable to Mordecai as a ruler - better a malleable fool than an ambitious tyrant like Haman

This interpretation differs from Marty Solomon’s earlier reading and becomes crucial for understanding how Esther’s plan works.

Character Analysis: Mordecai

Mordecai is presented as a patient, long-term political strategist and effective leader:

His name derives from Marduk, the patron deity of Babylon, reminding readers this is not his first exile
As a Benjamite, he inherits the tribal blessing of being like “a wolf that tastes prey in the morning and feasts at night” - patient, persistent, strategic
His family names relate to hunting and scheming, establishing his character as a careful planner
He is described as a leader the Jewish diaspora actually follows without complaint, unlike Moses
His strategy of protecting the king from assassination and positioning Esther as queen demonstrates long-term thinking
He makes a critical error in refusing to bow to Haman, likely because he either believed the command was fake or thought he had enough clout to ignore this upstart
His mistake reveals that even wise strategists can overplay their hand

Character Analysis: Haman

Haman represents unbridled ambition combined with dangerous insecurity:

His name possibly means “glorious” or alternatively “to be alone” - both meanings are thematically significant
His father’s name Hammedatha means “two-faced”
He is identified as an Agagite, descendant of King Agag of the Amalekites whom Saul failed to kill in 1 Samuel 15
His response to Mordecai’s refusal to bow is wildly disproportionate - immediate rage and genocidal intent
He thinks extremely short-term despite his political success
He possesses great wealth and rhetorical skill, using both to manipulate the king
He clearly aspires to be king himself, as shown when he suggests the honored person should wear the king’s clothes and crown
His Freudian slip about the queen reveals his ambition extends to possessing everything that belongs to the king
Despite his success, he is fundamentally alone - even his own wife abandons him when his fortunes turn

The Benjamite-Amalekite Conflict

The tension between Mordecai and Haman is not simply personal but represents an ancient, unfinished conflict:

In 1 Samuel 15, King Saul (a Benjamite) was commanded to completely destroy the Amalekites and their king, Agag
Saul kept Agag alive and took the best plunder, disobeying God’s command
This was Saul’s final mistake before Samuel abandoned him
The Amalekites were marked for destruction because they attacked the weakest Israelites during the exodus
Haman’s existence as an Agagite represents the consequences of Saul’s incomplete obedience
For the original audience, hearing “Benjamite” and “Agagite” would immediately signal inevitable conflict
The story of Esther becomes the completion of what Saul failed to accomplish

Esther’s Strategy: Brazen Silence

Esther’s plan is far more sophisticated than simply entering the throne room bravely:

The Setup:

She uses the phrase “if it will be good for the king” - language specifically used elsewhere in Esther when someone is manipulating the king
This phrase appears when the king’s advisors convince him to ban Vashti, and when Haman convinces him to sell the Jewish people

The Manipulation:

Esther creates urgency by breaking protocol to enter the throne room, signaling something critically important
She then refuses to say what it is, inviting the king to a private feast instead
The king’s mind immediately goes to the last time Esther brought urgent information: the assassination plot
By inviting Haman to both feasts, she plants the idea that the threat involves someone close to the king

The Psychological Warfare:

For the king: feeds his insecurity and paranoia, making him think there’s a plot he cannot be told about publicly
For Haman: feeds his ambition and overconfidence, making him think he’s being included because he’s special
Esther leads the king to his own discovery rather than making a direct accusation, which allows the king’s paranoia to do her work
The king cannot sleep because he’s trying to figure out who might be plotting against him
He reviews the records of the previous assassination attempt to look for patterns

The Brilliant Simplicity:

Esther never has to directly accuse Haman or present evidence
She never has to ask the king to choose between her and Haman
She simply creates a situation where the king’s insecurity and Haman’s overconfidence lead to Haman’s self-destruction
The king eventually concludes Haman is attempting a coup or assault on the queen
Haman’s isolation means no one defends him when things turn against him

The Theme of Divine Silence

A central argument of the episode is that God’s absence in the Book of Esther is not a flaw but the point:

The book speaks to people living in exile where God seems silent
If the turning point (the king’s sleeplessness) is attributed to divine intervention, it undermines the theme
The narrative would then say: “You can’t do anything, just wait for God to show up and fix things”
In a Joseph-style story with divine communication, God would have sent a dream, not just caused sleeplessness
The book instead emphasizes human wisdom, agency, and community as the vehicles of salvation
Modern believers also live in an age where God seems silent - no new gospels, no direct prophetic revelation
The Book of Esther provides a model for faith and action in contexts of divine silence

The Symbolism of Purim (The Dice)

The name of the holiday celebrating this story is itself meaningful:

Purim means “lots” or “dice” - referring to the method Haman used to choose the date for destroying the Jews
It’s dark humor to name a celebration after the instrument meant to determine the date of Jewish annihilation
The dice represent the sense that life is random, controlled by forces beyond one’s control
The message of the book is that the dice are actually loaded - not by direct divine intervention, but by the structure of reality
Evil that isolates itself through ambition ultimately falls
Community that genuinely connects people becomes the channel for divine purposes
What appears to be chance is actually the inevitable consequence of character and relationships

Community as the Counter to Fate

The fundamental wisdom of Esther is not about individual brilliance but communal strength:

Throughout the book, we know the names of servants who connect Esther and Mordecai
The Jewish people fast and pray together while Esther meets the king
Mordecai and Esther’s success depends on their connection to and leadership of their community
In contrast, Haman accumulates followers only through financial incentives
When Haman falls, no one defends him - not even his own wife
His ultimate isolation is highlighted when they use his own gallows to execute him
The book suggests that material power, wealth, and political skill ultimately fail without genuine community
For people in exile feeling powerless, the message is clear: build authentic community as the foundation for change

Esther and Vashti as Mirrors

A subtle theme is how Esther’s actions mirror and reverse Vashti’s:

Vashti was commanded to come to the king but refused
Esther was not commanded to come to the king but did anyway
Multiple small reversals and parallels exist throughout the narrative
This mirroring demonstrates the careful literary construction of the book

Joseph Typology Throughout Esther

The episode mentions extensive parallels to the Joseph story:

Hidden identity is central to both narratives
Being second under the king/pharaoh appears in both
Multiple characters reflect Joseph: Mordecai, Haman, and Esther all have Joseph-like moments
The parallels are so extensive they form multiple chiastic structures
Understanding these connections would require extensive additional study

Examples & Applications

Historical Context: Multiple Exiles

Mordecai’s character reflects someone who has experienced not just one but multiple exiles. His name connects him to Babylon (through Marduk), but he now lives in Persia. This teaches us about the long-term nature of displacement and suffering. For the original audience, this would resonate with their own experience of extended exile without clear end dates or promises of return. It suggests that wisdom for life in exile requires patience, long-term thinking, and the ability to navigate political realities across generations and empires.

The Passover Timing

When Haman casts lots to determine when to execute the Jews, they fall on a date almost a year away - specifically, the day before Passover. This creates bitter irony for the Jewish audience. Passover celebrates freedom from slavery in Egypt and God’s deliverance of his people. The day before this celebration of liberation, Haman plans to execute them all. This would be like planning a massacre of a people group for July 3rd in America - the day before Independence Day. The timing transforms the celebration into mourning, evoking the image of Pharaoh’s slaughter of Hebrew children.

Modern Application: God’s Silence

Many contemporary believers experience God’s silence, particularly in Western contexts where dramatic miracles, new Scripture, and direct prophetic revelation are rare or absent. The Book of Esther provides a model for faith in such contexts. Rather than waiting passively for supernatural intervention, believers are called to exercise wisdom, build genuine community, and act strategically. The Spirit works through these natural channels rather than replacing them with supernatural shortcuts.

Political Manipulation Techniques

Esther’s strategy offers insights into how rhetoric and psychology work in political contexts. Rather than direct confrontation, she uses:

Creating urgency without specifics to trigger anxiety
Strategic inclusion that appears like honor but actually implicates
Allowing the target to reach conclusions themselves rather than forcing acceptance
Exploiting known psychological weaknesses (the king’s insecurity, Haman’s overconfidence)

While the context is saving her people from genocide, the techniques themselves are value-neutral and appear throughout politics and organizational dynamics.

The Danger of Isolation in Leadership

Haman’s story serves as a cautionary tale about leadership built on power rather than relationship. Despite his wealth, political success, and proximity to the king, he has no genuine allies. His wife and friends celebrate with him when he’s winning but abandon him immediately when fortune turns. Contemporary leaders - whether in business, ministry, or politics - face the same temptation to accumulate power and position rather than build authentic community. The text suggests this is not merely morally problematic but strategically foolish.

Community as Resistance Strategy

For communities facing oppression or experiencing powerlessness, the Book of Esther offers a practical framework. Rather than waiting for external salvation, oppressed communities are encouraged to:

Develop wise, patient leaders who think long-term
Build genuine networks of mutual support and communication
Act strategically within existing power structures
Maintain cultural and communal identity across generations
Recognize that material and spiritual resources flow through community connections

This has applications for refugee communities, religious minorities, economically disadvantaged groups, and others experiencing systemic challenges.

Potential Areas for Further Exploration

Detailed Joseph Typology: The episode mentions extensive parallels between Esther and the Joseph narrative, including hidden identity, elevation to positions of power, and multiple chiastic structures. A thorough study mapping these parallels would reveal deeper layers of meaning.
Name Etymology and Significance: Every major character’s name carries symbolic weight (Mordecai/Marduk, Haman/glorious or alone, Hammedatha/two-faced, Ahasuerus/great warrior). A systematic study of all names in the book would reveal additional thematic elements.
Rabbinic Interpretations: The episode briefly mentions rabbinic theories (such as Haman wearing an idol), but extensive midrash exists on the Book of Esther. Exploring traditional Jewish interpretation would provide additional insights.
Comparative Exile Literature: How does Esther compare to other biblical texts dealing with exile (Daniel, Ezekiel, portions of Jeremiah)? What different strategies for faithfulness in exile are presented across these texts?
Gender Dynamics in Esther: The role of women in this narrative is significant - Vashti’s refusal, Esther’s rise to power, the contrast between them. A feminist reading of the text would reveal important dimensions.
The Literary Structure of Esther: The episode mentions chiastic structures and careful literary construction. A detailed analysis of the book’s literary features, including symmetries, reversals, and plot structure would enhance understanding.
Esther in Jewish Liturgy and Purim Celebration: How has the Jewish community traditionally read and celebrated this text? What elements of the Purim celebration illuminate the text’s meaning?
The Ethics of Esther’s Strategy: Is manipulation justified when saving lives? What are the moral boundaries of strategic deception? How do different ethical frameworks evaluate Esther’s actions?
Amalekite History and Theology: The connection to the Amalekites runs throughout Scripture from Exodus through 1 Samuel to Esther. A comprehensive study of this thread would provide context for understanding the Mordecai-Haman conflict.
Esther and the Canon: Esther is one of the most debated books regarding canonicity, partly because it never mentions God. How have different traditions handled this text? Why was it ultimately included in the canon?
Theological Anthropology in Esther: What does this book teach about human nature, human agency, and human responsibility? How does it balance divine sovereignty with human action?
Community Formation Practices: If community is the book’s answer to powerlessness, what specific practices build the kind of community depicted here? How do modern communities cultivate these qualities?

Comprehension Questions

How does attributing the king’s sleeplessness to direct divine intervention undermine the central theme of the Book of Esther? What theological message changes if God is overtly active versus apparently silent in the narrative?
Explain Esther’s strategy of “brazen silence.” How did she manipulate both the king’s insecurity and Haman’s overconfidence simultaneously, and why was it more effective than directly accusing Haman?
What is the significance of Haman being identified as an “Agagite,” and how does this connect to King Saul’s failure in 1 Samuel 15? Why would the original audience immediately understand the Mordecai-Haman conflict upon hearing these tribal identifications?
Compare and contrast Mordecai and Haman as political operators. What are their respective strengths and weaknesses, and what ultimately determines their different outcomes?
What role does community play in the success of Esther and Mordecai versus the failure of Haman? How does the book suggest this applies to people living in contexts where God seems silent or absent?

Summary

Episode 247 of the BEMA Podcast presents a sophisticated reading of the Book of Esther that emphasizes human agency, strategic wisdom, and community strength over supernatural intervention. Josh Bossé argues that God’s silence in the narrative is not a flaw but the central point - speaking directly to the experience of exile and to modern believers who often experience God as silent or distant.

The episode provides psychological profiles of the main characters. King Ahasuerus emerges not as shrewd but as insecure and easily manipulated - valuable precisely because he is pliable. Mordecai appears as a patient, long-term strategist and effective community leader, though he makes a critical error in underestimating Haman’s danger. Haman is characterized by unbridled ambition, dangerous insecurity, and ultimately crippling isolation despite his wealth and power.

The heart of the episode explores Esther’s brilliant strategy of “brazen silence.” Rather than simply entering the throne room bravely, Esther executes a sophisticated psychological manipulation. She creates urgency by breaking protocol, then refuses to explain why, inviting both the king and Haman to private feasts. This feeds the king’s insecurity and paranoia while inflating Haman’s overconfidence. The king concludes on his own that Haman represents a threat, while Haman’s isolation means no one defends him when he falls.

The broader theological point centers on community as the vehicle for divine purposes in contexts of apparent divine silence. Unlike Haman, who accumulates power through wealth and manipulation but remains fundamentally alone, Esther and Mordecai draw strength from their connection to the Jewish community. The book suggests that the “dice” of fate are loaded - not through direct supernatural intervention, but through the inevitable consequences of character and relationships. Evil that isolates itself through ambition will eventually fail, while communities built on genuine connection become the channels through which deliverance comes.

For the original audience living in exile, and for modern readers experiencing God’s silence, the Book of Esther offers a practical model: cultivate wisdom, think long-term, build authentic community, and act strategically within existing power structures. Salvation comes not by passively waiting for divine intervention, but through these very human channels that become the vehicles of divine purposes.

Edit | Previous | Next

S6 247: Sleepless in Susa w/ Josh Bossé

Esther’s Plan for the King’s Throne Room [58:12]